2Udruženje roditelja teško bolesne djece u BiH
The Association of parents for disabled children in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Act

     The Association of parents of disabled children in Bosnia and Herzegovina support immunization projects, because the immunization is still the most adequate way of protection of childrens’ health.

But, the Association also defends childrens’ right to have safe vaccines and responsible health-care  decision makers.

The main activity of the Association is to monitor and report post vaccination complications as well as prosecutors’ investigations regarding health damage of children, while  connected with the immunization.

The Association also makes public protest  regarding visible violation of human right to have proper juridical procedure for health damages caused with immunization . Following content deals with  137 cases of babies deaths  and  300 children with acquired disability, based on severe neurological deterioration,   in Bosnia and Herzegovina  from 2002-2011. All cases failed  by point of view of medical evaluation, because of a lack of necessary data to have valid conclusions. There are:  

1.Lack of toxicologic analyses of open  vaccine vials, used by children,
1.Lack of laboratory analysis of the blood, spinal liquor, urin and tissue of the children,
2.Lack of toxic, viral, neurological and genetical juridical-medical expertise,

1 parent of a boy who experienced neurological status of coma three days after the immunization and later was diagnosed a global developmental delay, officially depositated a request for prosecutor's order to send his used  vial in laboratory to be exposed to toxicological expertise. A vial was sequestered on 10. 01. 2002 and for nine years waits chemical and toxicology analysis.
75 parents   officially depositated a request for all relevant medical analysis  to verify a cause of severe health damage of their children in 2010 and still wait for the answer.  
Following evaluation  containes four immunization problems:
1. Riscky co-administration   of  vaccines  of different manufacturers
2. Somministration of hepatitis B vaccines in first day of life
3. Elevated levels of mercury in DTPr polio vaccines
4. MRP related subacute sclerozing panencephalitis

                             3

 

I.)RISKY CO-ADMINISTRATION OF VACCINES OF DIFFERENT MANUFACTURERS

Following three case reviews  deals with prosecutors failures in evidencing post vaccination complications. First two has been investigated within Cantonal prosecution in Tuzla, court  registration number KTA 2514/10  and conducted by prosecutor Fatima Hadžibeganović.  The third has been investigated  within Prosecution of Doboj, court registration number T 15 0 KTA 0005785 11, and conducted by prosecutor Nataša Božičković.

1.reported to VAERS, on July 4th 2011

The Association of Parents of Disabled Children in Bosnia and Herzegovina has followed  the case of six-months-old E. B.  from Lukavac, Tuzla Canton.  E. B. was given Act HiB and Infanrix IPV vaccinations on November 10th 2010 and died about eight hours after getting these vaccines.
The parents of this dead baby described visible body reactions immediately before their baby’s death.  A rather dense, very dark brown, almost black, discharge was oozing from her nose.  Her arms and legs were flaccid and tended to fall down.  Similarly, she had also lost control of her head.  After a couple of minutes, she stopped breathing.
Dr.Fuad Kešetović, an expert in forensic medicine, and his supervisor, Dr. Zdenko Cirhlaž, performed the autopsy and reported the cause of her death as “SIDS", sudden infant death syndrome, which is defined as “the unexpected, sudden death of a child under age 1 in which an autopsy does not show an explainable cause of death”.  Histopathological findings were also reported as “negative”.  Toxicological analysis was not conducted.
Our questions were and remain:
1.      Should not dark blood oozing from the child’s nose, listlessness, and a sudden cessation of breathing within a few hours of vaccination be considered post-vaccination complications?
2.      Why was this child’s death not reported to Federal Commission for the Surveillance of Post-vaccination Complications?
In Edina’s case, there were several obstacles.
1.      The Bosnian State Agency for Medicines Control showed a lot of partiality and patronizing attitude towards the two vaccine manufacturers.  The Agency suggested to a prosecutor that samples of the vials of both the Act HIB vaccine and the Infanrix IPV vaccine given to the child should be sent to their country of origin for analysis.  To analyze vaccine vials in such a manner is not a standard investigation procedure anywhere in the world because of inherent conflicts of interest.
2.      The current organization of our national epidemiological services fails to require two critical items required for the proper tracking and investigation of post-vaccination complications.  First, the administering health personnel are not required, under penalty of law, to record the specific batch identifier (lot number) of the vaccine vial used to give a vaccine dose to the child .  Both of the vials from which E. B. received the vaccines had been discarded making it impossible to perform a toxicological analysis of the open vials from which E.B.’s vaccines were taken.  Even if the discarded vials were retrieved from the garbage cans within the pediatrics service in Lukavac, it would be impossible to verify which of them belonged to E.B. because the batch numbers of her two vials were not recorded in her medical records.  Thus, at best, toxicological analysis can be done only on unused vials having the same batch identifiers, which is much less relevant for understanding the possible adverse health impact of vaccine doses E.B. was given.  Second, there is no requirement for the direct monitoring for, and the recording of, post-vaccination complications when one or more vaccines are given during the same visit, which should be a legal obligation for all those working in the public health sector who give vaccines. 
3.      The Centre for Forensic Medicine and Toxicology from Novi Sad, Vojvodina performed a forensic investigation.  Their experts judged that baby's death is caused by a failure of the vital centers of the brain.  In their opinion, E.B.’s death occurred because of insufficient blood flow to the brain stem, which was caused by the stretching and twisting of the spinal artery between the first cervical vertebra and occipital bone.  According to their report, this injury occurred because of E. B.’s excessive head rotation, which was caused by the baby's turning herself from her back to her stomach.  This expert report was published before the end of investigation and before any laboratory analysis of the vials. 
Thus:
a.      Their report did not contain any toxicological facts, which are indispensable part of any general medical investigation.  Their report was premature, apparently hasty, and preceded the final report that there was no cause-effect links between vaccination and death.  From our point of view, the Agency for Medicines Control didn’t react properly and its behavior abdicated its role of controller of pharmaceutical products in the local market.
b.      The experts from Novi Sad did not address the source of the energy for the baby to turn from her back to her stomach when the first police records reported that her head, arms, and legs were limp and tended to fall down.  This part of the findings remains unclear.
c.      The experts from Novi Sad also didn’t address E.B.’s adverse reaction to her multiple vaccine exposures.  Because of a fact that eight hours before death, the baby’s body had been inoculated with multiple antigens (for diphtheria, whooping cough (pertussis), tetanus, haemophilus influenzae B and inactivated polio viruses) from four different bacteria and several chemical substances that may cause serious adverse reactions in some babies, a valid determination of the cause of this child’s death under such circumstances would require an in-depth analysis by experts with undisputed expertise on the possibility of an “attack” (adverse immune system response) caused by multiple exposures of concomitantly injected antigens that possibly  triggered a strong adverse reaction  in this baby’s cardiovascular system.  Such cardiovascular reaction could also have caused the decreased blood flow to her head.  So, this aspect of the reported findings remains unaddressed.
d.      The experts from Novi Sad in BiH also did not show numerical values from the results of analysis of brain samples from which they made their judgments about the stretching and constricting of the “spinal artery” or the reduced blood flow to the brain stem.  Moreover, the public lacks an explanation of whether the numerical values obtained, if any, fell within the normal range for each measurement and whether the divergence of any of these values from the norm has any statistical significance.

2. reported to VAERS, on July 4th 2011

On 6 November 2010, M.B., a two-months old baby from Gnojnica, near Lukavac received  a donated HIB vaccine, Act HiB,  and a DTPr vaccine, Infanrix IPV. Before receiving the vaccine, the baby was examined by his pediatrician, who  approved MB’s vaccination because he found that M.B. was completely healthy. 
M.B. received the vaccines at 18:00 (6:00 PM, in the evening), and, shortly after his vaccinations, M.B. began crying and cried the rest of the night.  The next day, M.B. stopped eating, was constantly moving his tongue in and out of his mouth, and his eyes were dull and lifeless, “like the eyes of dead fish”. The third morning, there was blood in M.B.’s urine and he began to choke and to have trouble breathing (apnea).  Because his choking did not stop, M.B. was rushed to the pediatric hospital in Tuzla. M.B. was  hospitalized and on a respirator for 13 days before M.B. was “well enough” to be discharged.
After he was discharged from the hospital, the parents of M.B. still must treat M.B. with a breathing machine every night for half an hour.
Our questions are:
1.      Should M.B.’s apnea, which appeared third morning after his vaccinations, be considered a post-vaccination complication?
2.      Why was this apnea not reported to the Federal Commission for the Surveillance of Post-vaccination Complications?
3.      Is this illness coincidental to M.B.’s vaccinations, or drug-induced by microbial contamination derived from vaccines? Since the DTPr vaccines are made from toxins purified from killed, lysed bacterial cells that are then “purified”, the probability that the source organisms are contaminating is near zero.  Similarly, the contamination of the ActHib by H. influenza type B is near zero, but some unpredictable events can always happen. However, the probability that subsequent bacterial contamination occurs from adventitious (opportunistic) organisms in the environment because of poor controls or control failures is not near zero.
The question to be answered is whether the reporting of M.B.’s illness, occurring immediately after his vaccinations, was suppressed  by the commission charged with monitoring of recognized post-vaccination complications that  they are, or should be, required to monitored. The diagnoses on M.B.’s Hospital Discharge letter  were “bronchial asthma” and “whooping cough”.  Moreover, the pediatricians  stated that M.B.’s illness was not caused by the vaccines he received. 
Given the preceding facts,  it is critical that independent experts should carefully examine baby M.B.’s medical records.
What causes the most doubt on what was reported is the fact that, some time after baby M.B. was admitted to the hospital, bacteriological analyses were performed but the tests done and the results found were not reported in M.B.’s  discharge letter.  The absence of this laboratory report in M.B.’s discharge letter is contrary to the doctor's practice.  This is the case because doctors usually  include such findings, especially when it is important to exclude them as causal factors in M.B.’s illness.  For example, if no identifiable bacteria is found in the testing, the discharge report would usually include the phrase  “ bacteriological findings- negative”.  These doubts caused a rumor to circulate in Lukavac  that, when the baby's grandfather went into the children's hospital in Tuzla,  the doctors refused to give him the bacteriological findings of his grandchild.  The association considers such refusal as  significant violation of human rights. Why these unavailable bacteriological findings are important? First, in the production of the DTPr vaccine, the separated toxins from the deactivated bacteria Bordetella pertussis are isolated and used to make up one-third of the DTPr vaccine.  The role of these toxins is to induce the inoculated child’s immune system to make antibodies to these toxins so that, if the child is infected with some strain of Bordetella pertussis, the child’s immune system will produce toxin-neutralizing antibodies that neutralize these toxins and protect the child from being harmed by them. If this vaccine were somehow subsequently contaminated with these bacteria, the report could indicate that the child’s whooping cough was caused by the vaccine strain of this bacterium. The development of whooping cough has a recognized “silent” incubation period followed by the development of symptoms that resemble those of the common cold accompanied by a characteristic “whooping” cough that gives the disease its common name.  If the child were infected by B. pertussis bacteria prior to being inoculated with the DTPr vaccine, the treating pediatrician would need to know the probable exposure date occurred days before inoculation and that the strain of the infecting “whooping cough” bacteria was not the vaccine strain.  To do this, he or she would see that the microbiological laboratory results supported an infection prior to M.B.’s vaccination date.  At a minimum, the discharge notice should include a statement that supported the non-vaccine-related “whooping cough” diagnosis given.
Similarly, if the polysaccharide-derived donated ActHIB vaccine used to protect against infection by the bacterium Haemophilus influenzae type B (‘HIB’) was  somehow subsequently contaminated with the vaccine strain of HIB, that contamination could have caused M.B. to exhibit the symptoms of meningitis.  If this were the case, the microbiology laboratory’s report should have shown the presence of HIB bacteria and identified the HIB bacteria as the same sub-strain as that used to make the vaccine.
The baby also might have  been exposed to other infectious bacteria, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and Serratia marcesens, and  subsequently get a bacterial pneumonia that develops in septic inflammation, which would not have had any direct connection with the received vaccines. [Other possible disease-causing organisms include, but are not limited to, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus viridans, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, viral Influenzae types A and B, Chlamydia psittaci, Coxiella burnetti, fungi  Actinomyces israeli,  Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Chlamydia pneumoniae.]
If the first two types of bacteria were found in the baby's body, they could have entered the child though  manufacturer-contaminated vaccines.  For example, the donated ‘single-dose’ ActHIB vaccine containers have no preservative because the tetanus-toxoid-conjugated-polysaccharide-derived antigens it contains do not need protection from bacteria provided aseptic conditions are maintained throughout the vaccine’s production, distribution and usage. When the vaccine and its diluent are produced under completely aseptic (‘microbe free’) conditions, then there is no risk of vaccine contamination prior to its being properly reconstituted and dispensed. Thus, the findings in the microbiology laboratory’s report are required for any valid independent assessment to be made as to whether the appropriate tests were performed to identify the bacteria, and the specific strains(s) of the bacteria found and their sub-strain and, if the proper testing was conducted, the causal bacteria for the child’s diagnoses are linked to the vaccine, or  M.B.’s diagnoses are two completely independent coincidental events that are time-related accident.
The association states that only prosecutor’s order of detention for dr. Nevzeta H., who had bacteriological laboratory reports in her hands, will be efficient  means to find this report and to allow independent experts to see what was written there.  [According to the Penal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the legal basis for the detention is hiding or destroying of evidence, which is criminal act against the justice.]
Another  problematic indication in the diagnosis of baby M. B. is the reported ‘interruption of breathing’.  It is a symptom seen both in bronchial asthma and in apnea. The description of symptoms  provided by the pediatricians does not offer enough  detail to distinguish between these two diagnoses .  Therefore, the association  is demanding that the Cantonal Prosecution in Tuzla provide the detailed medical indicators of the condition of the airways and lungs of baby M.B. that are required to determine which of these two diagnoses (asthma or apnea) is actually the correct one. A main purpose for requiring this information is to provide the data needed to determine whether baby M. B.’s medical condition was an infection of the airways in the child’s lungs, simply a constriction of these airways, or some combination of both.
In M.B.'s case, the ways of transmission, and the possible sources, of any bacterial contamination are very reduced. M.B. was only two months and eleven days old when he was hospitalized. M.B. was exclusively breast-fed with his mother's milk; he couldn't sit up, crawl or  walk; and he didn't go to a park, to a kindergarten or to a school.  In short, M.B. couldn't socialize  and his contacts with other persons were very limited.
His bed, his clothes, and a room where he stays day and night is very clean. Beside vaccines, the only possible carrier of bacteria can be M.B.’s father who had some post-surgical complications and was in hospital for a period before M. B. became sick.
The Association of parents of disabled children from Bosnia and Herzegovina takes statement that in both presented cases there were no enough valid evidence to make final conclusion “it is not from vaccine”.

3. reported to VAERS, on July 4th 2011

 

B.D. received both a DTPr vaccine and a HIB vaccine on 05. 04. 2011 in Doboj, when he was 2 months of age, died approximately 12 hours after his immunization.  His mother last fed him at midnight. Early the next morning, his parents found him dead.  His aunt said that Boško didn't even cry after the vaccines and there were no visible signs of any strange process in his body.
B.D. received a dose of a DTPr Aldipete-T vaccineby Torlak Institute from Serbia and a dose of an Act HIB vaccine manufactured by Sanofi Aventis.  In first month of his life, B.D. had been immunized with a BCG vaccine and with the first dose of a hepatits B vaccine.
Our questions were:

When parents asked prosecutor if blood samples has been taken from baby's body, a prosecutor answered, “I suppose, yes“.  A prosecutor who handled the investigation didn't even know exactly such important fact regarding investigation.  When parents asked where the autopsy will be made, a prosecutor answered, “I think in Doboj“.  In this moment, we don't have any information about either the prosecutor's order to sequester two vials of vaccines and to expose them to toxicological analysis or the prosecutor's order to sequester more vials from the same serial and to expose them to toxicological analysis.  We only know that, in the available vaccination records for B.D., there is no batch number for either of the two vaccines this child received at 2 months of age.  We can only add that recording the batch number of the vaccine administered should be required because his absence limits the ability of pharmaco vigillance to determine whether or not a particular batch of vaccine is causing problems in mutiple cases.  Moreover, without the batch number, it is not possible to attribute this child's death to a particular lot of either or both of these two vaccines.
The autopsy report has been made by Dr. Ljubomir Curkić from Doboj.  Dr. Curkić judged that a cause of B. D.'s death as natural death, because of general suffocation, as consequence of acute respiratory illness - primary atypical pneumonia .  However, the autopsy report of B. D. didn't identify the type of bacteria or virus that was a cause of this child's atypical pneumonia.  Beside that, autopsy report of B. D. didn't make diagnostic difference between pneumonia and other sources of respiratory problems, such as epiglottitis caused by haemophilus influenzae B, or with multiple antigen exposure.
This child's autopsy report  contained the following statements:

Dr. Curkić also wrote that his evaluation, “has been based on circumstances of the event, existing medical documentation, toxicological and bacteriological reports” (page 4).  But, his report did not contain any toxicological and bacteriological facts, which are an indispensable part of any general medical investigation.  It is important to remember that, just after vaccination, in this case, two-months-old B.D., and in two previous cases, three-months-old M. B. and six-months-old E. B., these babies all developed respiratory problems.  E.B. and B.D. both apparently stopped breathing and died.  M.B. began to choke and had to be kept on a respirator for 13 days.   
We are also concerned about the missing bacteriological report for E. B.  We even don’t know if this bacteriological report was not generated or if it just has not been shown to her parents. The microbiological findings of mucus were also never shown to her parents, although being requested in very determinant way. Now, we have not been provided any bacteriological findings identifying the putative causal organism or organisms for the “primary atypical pneumonia” finding for B. D.
We are convinced that, if they were available, a comparison between three bacteriological findings might have significant diagnostic value, especially a comparison of the bacteriological laboratory reports for M.B. and B.D.
We are also convinced that the concealment of the results of actual bacteriological reports or the decision not to conduct a bacteriological evaluation are no longer infrequent occurrences. Many in the Bosnian audience suspect that these three missing bacteriological findings might be connected, in some manner, to the bacteria haemophilus influenzae B, contained in donated HIB vaccine.

Author: Jagoda Savić, 
Reviewed by: Dr. Paul G. King, PhD

 

                    4

 

II.) SOMMINISTRATION OF HEPATITIS B VACCINES IN FIRST DAY OF LIFE

 

    This report address a UNICEF project for early childhood vaccination of all newborn babies in Bosnia and Herzegovina against hepatitis B in first day of life, second and third month of age, which started in 2002 and has continued into 2011. This project has been founded by GAVI organization within the World Health Organization (WHO) and has been strongly supported by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

There is a serious suspicion that numerous adverse reactions and side effects are provoked by this particular vaccination program. Moreover, from 2002-2011 these serious vaccination related adverse events were not registered in official records but rather carefully hidden from the public by the our public health authorities, in order to present either the hepatitis B vaccine or this hepatitis B vaccination program in positive way.

This case review presents eight babies, one dead and seven who have been permanently and completely disabled. However, there are at least another 67 cases of serious adverse vaccine reaction that should be carefully examined. In addition, there are an additional 15 cases that were not reported to our organization. Thus, it seems that the final number of babies who may have been seriously injured by one of their early childhood hepatitis B vaccinations may significantly exceed the number identified at the time of this report. In addition of some unknown factor or a combination of the vaccination issues raised by this report, the adverse outcomes seen in these babies have raised the question as to whether their severe health damage can solely be attributed to: 1) a bad vaccination program, 2) a bad quality vaccine or 3) a bad body response to the vaccine.

1.Bad vaccination program:
According to the available information on this UNICEF project, the hepatitis B vaccine is given to healthy newborn babies in the first 24 hours of life after they are first given a BCG vaccine. In 2002, when this project began, the number of other European countries which recommended the vaccination of all healthy newborn babies against hepatitis B in first 12 or 24 hours of life was nine: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Turkey and Spain.

The birth dose of the BCG vaccine, given alone for decades, has never reported to cause serious health problems in young babies. From 2002, when the hepatitis B vaccine began to be administred to newborn babies just after the BCG vaccine, this co-administration at birth seems to have contributed to or caused a significant increase of instances of severe neurological deterioration in some of these newborn babies, which started shortly after they were vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine.

This issue is of special concern because, for years, Federal Statistic report has not provided information on the number of cases or the incidence of mental diseases among children 0-7 years. In addition, instead of unbiased surveillance, that should have resulted in a determination of whether  or not these adverse reactions were caused by the birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine, for years our public health authorities have stubbornly denied any possible connection between the birth-dose hepatitis B vaccination and the subsequent neurological health damage observed in some newborn babies. As a consequence, there is wide spread suspicion of misinterpretation and data distortion concerning the frequency of adverse reactions and side effects with respect to the day of birth hepatitis B vaccination program.
BCG and hepatitis B vaccine given the same day open a problem of the double dose of mercury from the Thimerosal ( or Thiomersal)1  used as a preservative in multidose formulation of these two vaccines. In the small scale clinical studies used to evaluate the co-administration of these two vaccines, the study of the “safety” of this co-vaccination strategy screened out out any less then healthy, fully gestationally newborns, including these newborns with an immature liver.
In the instances where a new born baby has an immature liver, the child’s liver is not capable of producting a sufficient quantity of bile, which is the man excretory route for the discharge of mercury from the body. In addition, such babies have little ability to produce glutathione, a substance required for the liver to detoxify and eliminate mercury from the body.These two doses of mercury introduced together into a newborn child’s body probably create not only some mercury toxicity but also provide accumulative effect for mercury toxicity in those children who later acquired mercury poisoning with subsequent Thimerosal (or Thiomersal) preserved vaccines that these newborns receive later in their young lives.
Based on the available information, both vaccines contain a normal level of Thimerosal of 0.01% and the dose fiven is o.5 mL of each. Give these parameters, the dose of Thimerosal is nominally 100 micrograms and the nominal dose of mercury has increased from 25 micrograms of mercury when only the BCG vaccine was administred to 50 micrograms of mercury when both the BCG and the Euvax B vaccines are co-administred.

2. Bad quality vaccine:
To determine that these eight babies, and the other 67 who should be examined, were simply rare instances where the adverse response should be mostly or solely attributed to a bad reaction to a “reasonably safe” vaccine, the Federal Institute for Public Health in Sarajevo should, at minimum, have and be able  to share the indisputable evidence of the safety of each of two vaccines (BCG and Euvax B) as well as the safety of the co-administration of these two vaccines to not only newborns in general but also the lowest weight, least gestationally developed to which these vaccines may be administred to such newborns.
Unfortunatelly, the Institute apparently lacks this crucial information about the safety of, and the risks associated with the Euvax B vaccine. In 2002, when this vaccination program was initiated the Institute had neither the complete technical documentation for the vaccine named Euvax B nor any list of adverse reactions and adverse side effects of Euvax B before the beginning of the administration of this vaccine to Bosnian babies. The public health authorities apparently never verified that the vaccine’s manufacturer has the required complete documentation that should be represented to local authorities, as required by the procedures for registering such remedies in Bosnia and Herzegovina and then giving the permits for vaccine’s public use.

Beside that:
a)in 2002 the number of countries in which the vaccine Euvax B was licenced for public use
was 30: 1) 1994-Bangladesh and the Philippines, 2) 1995-Argentina, Guatemala, Korea and Myanmar, 3)1996-Ecuador, 4)1997- Uruguay, 5) 1998-Thailand, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Iraq, 6) 1999-Costa Rica, Jamaica, Trinidad&Tobago, Kyrghystan and Uzbekistan, 7) 2000-Chile, Dominican Republic, Peru, Pakistan, Turkey, Mauritius and Togo and 8) 2000-Aruba, Paraguay, Moldova, Jordan and Gabon. When it gave this hepatitis B vaccine a permit for public use on August 7th 2001,  the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina became the first and only country in Europe that had license for use to this vaccine.
b)The requisite experts reports about Euvax B has been not available to parents of children who should be, or were, vaccinated as well as to general Bosnian public for nine years. All this period of time Bosnian citizens were convinced that the manufacturer of Euvax B was Sanofi Aventis, to give the impression of quality to the  vaccine. After a determined investigation and required enquiries, our organization discovered that the real manufacturer of Euvax B was LG from South Korea and Aventis only general distributor of this vaccine. Obviously, the name of Aventis has been misused by local public health authorities to inflate the perceived quality of the product in the eyes of the parents, who wanted to know more about the vaccines given to their children.
These reports include the required pharmaceutical,chemical, biological, microbiological and viral vaccine’s documentation, especially the pharmaceutical and toxicological documentation to determine the toxicity to reproduction, embryo-fetal and perinatal toxicity, mutagenic potential, carcinogenic potential, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, local tolerability, ecotoxicity preparations etc. 
c) The main adviser of this UNICEF project was dr. Popov from Bulgaria, who never had even one day of previous experience in conducting a vaccine assessment epidemiological study nor published one epidemiological study article.

d) As far as we can determine, clinical tests on healthy newborn babies have not been conducted by manufacturer before the  beginning of public use of Euvax B in Bosnia and Herzegovina,  or clinical trial outcomes on less than healthy babies were never made available to Bosnian parents before the permit for public use in Bosnia and Herzegovina was issued, although the parents had demanded to see them, nor after  approval  of the vaccine’s licence for Bosnia and Herzegovina.

e) The duration of protective effect against hepatitis B for newborns after was not disclosed in the manufacturer’s “Instructions for use” printed in 2002. Factually, the duration of the protective effect against hepatitis B infection has only been established for carriers of this virus, and the protection has been found to last about 5 to 7 years for this group. Thus, the main purpose of the administration for this hepatitis B vaccine , to provide life time protection against hepatitis B, cannot be fulfilled. Moreover, the principal target of this UNICEF project , the vaccination of all newborn babies, has been achieved.

f) In the same manufacturer’s “Instructions for use”, the pharmaco-kinetic properties for this vaccine were also defined as unknown.
g) Medical care policy ignored the realities that: 1) hepatitis B is not a highly contagious and highly infectious liver disease that can be easily transmitted to children and easily infect them, and 2) the main channels for the spread of hepatitis B are needles sharing among intravenous drug users, multiple sexual contacts between sexually active persons, and pregnant women who are infected with hepatitis B and who may transmit the disease to their unborn children. In the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s (FBiH’s) health surveillance data for 1999-346 persons were reported as being infected with the hepatitis B virus: Unsko-Sanski Canton reported 97, Tuzlanski Canton reported 173, Zeničko- Dobojski reported 15 and the Bosansko- podrinjski Canton reported 1 case.  For hepatitis B disease, the data for 2000 speak about 62 persons: in the Usnko-Sanski Canton 58, in Posavski 2 and in Podrinjski 2. In short, the percentage of persons diagnosed with hepatitis B in FBiH was 0,015%, while WHO recognizes 2% as a level of the lowest level of risk for the spreading of an infectious diseases among a given population. In the FBiH, those with an hepatitis B infection are mainly abusers and children born by mothers who are carriers of the hepatitis B virus. So, it can be said that in 1999 a serious risk of exposure to the hepatitis B virus existed in only 3 cantons, in 2000 that risk only in one canton. Beside that, because hepatitis B is not a contagious disease transmitted by other than direct and/or intimate contact between individuals or through contaminated needles, the medical care policy should be focused on those individuals or groups who are at a high risk of infection because they are members of some recognized high- risk group or groups (e.g., intravenous drug users, sexually promiscuous persons and/ or the unborn children of mothers who are infected with the hepatitis B virus)
Thus, it seems obvious that FBiH public health officials made a decision to immunize all newborn children without any well documented benefit/risk assessment, without prior risk analysis performed before the mass early childhood vaccination of our children. In addition, the decision to vaccinate all healthy newborn babies was taken without: a) regard to the regional prevalence of the hepatitis B disease, b) regard to the nearzero risk of the spreading of hepatitis B disease in young children because the official data does not reflect the age of the persons in each of the reported helatitis B disease cases.
Based on all of the preceding realities, our organization must consider this UNICEF project as classic uncontrolled experiment. According to our point of view, the experimental situation created in Bosnia and Herzegovina with Euvax B appears to be the uncontrolled population testing of an inadequately tested vaccine.
Our organization considers the public use of Euvax B as an uncontrolled clinical trial that is designed to minimize the ability to obtain crucial safety informations about Euvax B, through, over time, it might provide some “effectiveness” information about the duration of protective effect from the early childhood doses of this hepatitis B vaccine. Thus, use in the FBiH is and was more of a marketing ploy to provide assurance that this vaccine’s use in the FBiH was reasonably safe and, therefore, acceptable for the use in the West European market. Because of the manner in which this vaccination program was implemented and its lack of active surveillance for adverse effects, it also appears that this UNICEF project was designed to hide adverse reactions in order to convince other public health services that hepatitis B vaccination in the first day of life is an acceptable health practice. Based on all preceding facts, our organization has identified this UNICEF project as violation of both Helsinky Declaration and the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
3. Bad body response to the vaccine
An investigation solely based on spontaneous reports is not sufficient for definitive conclusions, it can only generate hypotheses. In vaccination epidemiology, the scientific goal is to determine the probability that there is a clear link between devastating health consequencies and the exposure to a given vaccine or vaccines. In addition, by comparing those who received early childhood vaccinations for both BCG and the Euvax B hepatitis B vaccine or received neither vaccine, to ascertain if there is an apparent specific toxicity caused by hepatitis B vaccine, or if the adverse reactions observed can be attributed to other factors.
However, to do this properly,the public health officials should have an active vaccination strveillance system in place to keep track of all vaccinations and vaccination outcomes for immediate post-vaccination responses, short –term adverse responses, and longer-term adverse responses.
But, in addition to their routine population safety monitorin duties, since 2002, local regulatory authority has contonously refused to organize an adequate vaccination suriveillance system to monitor the vaccination program for Euvax B hepatitis B vaccine so that valid epidemiological analyses could be able to detect,monitor, and ascertain the relative risk for any adverse outcomes, including but  not limited to increased neurological deterioration that could be associated with the administration of Euvax B to newborn babies. Instead, local regulatory authorities have defended their lack of action with unconvincing and irrelevant argument “that neurological complications may be due to a latent predisposition”.
While this defence might be valid in some instances, it is not acceptable when the post-vaccination adverse effects seems to be linked to the maturity/ immaturity of the specific organ that the disease is supposed to attack and against which the vaccine is supposed to provide protection from that disease- the liver in the instance where Euvax B is involved. If the explanation “latent predisposition” were really the truth, in that case we should ask why have the Cantonal legal prosecution authorities in the allegation court number KTA 384/ 02 veza OT I,  conducted by prosecutor Sead Kreštalica,  refused to accept 75 parents’s official requests to clarify the facts that were formally submitted to these authorities in 2010? All that parents demanded was that, for each harmed child, the child’s condition would be examined by recognized medical experts in neurology, toxicology and genetics to determine the causal factors implicated in each child’s case. If immature liver were really determined to be the maior latent predispositional factor, then, in such instance, the Cantonal prosecutors should make a penal allegation against the accountable public health officials for a criminal act against public health for misapplication of this hepatitis B vaccination program at risk newborns and for their failure to identify and follow those newborns with serious adverse reactions in order to identify those newborns that were in the risk groups for such adverse effects and remove those groups of newborns from the vaccination program. The same prosecutorial refusal happened with the allegation, court number  T 13 0KT 0004525 11, conducted by prosecutor Remzija Smajlović, while in the allegation, court number KTA 58/ 09, a mother of dead baby gave up by her own self.
No one of highly positioned decision makers in immunization or in  law protection either  recognized real problem of immature liver or protected Bosnian babies from further exposition to possible health danger.Mr. George Mills, a head of ACCU ( anti corruption and criminal unit) within  the highest political authority in BiH OHR, on December 4th 2003 wrote : “I can only suggest that you ask the appropriate Bosnian agencies to deal with this matter”. Maria Calivis, director of UNICEF for Europe, on February 20th 2005 wrote: “I want to reiterate that our UNICEF office in BiH, which is directly dealing with this matter, has been cooperative in providing all information requested.” Dr. Jean- Marie Okwo-Bele, director of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals department within WHO, on June 5th 2007 wrote :“The investigation of adverse events recently reported in Viet Nam after hepatitis B vaccination is ongoing. WHO will continue to communicate with national authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina ( and other countries) to ensure that reported adverse events that could be potentially  related to the Euvax B vaccine are included in the current investigation.” Dr. Adwoa Bentsi-Enchill, fromQuality, Safety and Standards within WHO, on July 3th 2007 wrote:”The issues you raised have been noted and will be taken in consideration in evaluation of the safety of the Euvax B vaccine”.
Helen Madonick from “Gates foundation” on January 18th wrote: “In 2002, this same individual (jagoda Savic) and NGO raised questions HepB vaccine shipped to Bosnia….”
No one of these responsible persons ever  had any efficient evaluation of hepatitis B matter.
German doctor Wolfgang Wodarg, who saw all 75 parents’ requests on the occasion of his visit to our organization, publicly called upon the Bosnian government, UNICEF and GAVI to establish an independent commission in order to examine crucial medical indicators of neurological
deterioration in these damaged newborn babies: http://www.wodarg.de/show/3943348.html

One of medical facts that deserve to be stressed is also the biological plausibility of hepatitis B vaccine to induce auto-immune reactions. For example, many hepatitis recipients have been shown to develop transient antibodies that are reactive to both the hepatitis B surface antigen and to human myelin oligodendricite glycolprotein. Even this one item deserves careful assessment of the risk/benefit ratio for administration  of Euvax B at birth. But, instead of open-minded scientific surveillance, for years we have had : a) stubborn denial of any possible connection between an early childhood Euvax B vaccination and neurological health damage of newborn babies, b) fake presentation of the incidence of adverse reactions, and c) data distortion if not even falsification of the adverse effects data for the FBiH’s early childhood Euvax B hepatitis B vaccination program.
To this important item, we are also adding a lack of conformance in Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European standards for record keeping for vaccination. For example, our pediatric services rarely register the batch number of the vaccine used in vaccination record of the child and never have an appropriate toxicological analysis performed on the remainings in a vial or other vials of a lot of vaccine that is linked to any severe adverse reactions. There is also unacceptable practice of giving children two different vaccines produced by two different manufacturers on the same day, without making certain that there are no possible incompatibilities between the vaccines given at the same time.
This brings us to the eight (8) children for whom we are providing individual reports. All eight of these children have three factors in common: neuro-muscular disorders, permanent brain damage and a lack of any toxicological analysis of the remaining in vials of vaccine that they were given, or, if the vial in question contained insufficient residual volume or was not still available, other vials in the lots of vaccines these children were given.

1.) reported to VAERS, on July 4th 2011
vaccinated on: September 13th 2008, adverse reaction 7 days later,
medical summary: hypotonia, heavy neural lesion, 100 % disability, psycho motor retardation, lack of sphincters control,

L.R. was born 7 day before his due date, as healthy baby, on September  13th 2008, and he died on May 31st , 2009. L.R. received a 0.5-mL dose of Euvax B hepatitis B vaccine a first day of his life, on September 13th   2008 and, for some unspecified reason, the injection of Vitamin K.
L.R. had three post vaccination adverse reactions.  His first reaction appeared seven days after his first Hepatitis B dose, when L.Rstopped using his arms. But, beside the problem with his arms, L.R. was active in the first month of his  life he moved his feet and hands and began to control the position of his head.  A couple of days before his BCG vaccination was scheduled to be administered, L.R. had caught a cold  and was being given Sinacillin Adrianol nose drops when he was taken to the pediatrician.  When his cold symptoms ended, L.R. received a 0.5-mL BCG injection.
His second adverse reaction was noticed 33days later.  On October 16th  2006, during his pre-vaccination screening before giving the second hepatitis B vaccination, the pediatrician noticed that the baby was limp and unable to control the position of his head.  He also found that the L.R.’s muscle tone was uneven and the predominant muscle tone was hypotonia of his extremities and torso with uncontrolled head positioning. After an examination by pediatrician, who looked over his medical history and examined L.R., he was still given his second dose of the  Euvax B hepatitis B vaccine A third adverse reaction appeared following his second hepatitis B injection; L.R. became much more listless and flaccid.
A medical exam in Children’s hospital in Belgrade reported very heavy neural lesions, that could be the lesion localized paroxsimally, on the level of spinal cord motor neurons, and could be interpreted in favor of spinal muscular atrophy type 1.
There are also the signs of acute ventriculitis, corpus callosum. L.R. did not have any control of his sphincters.

His health status became worse and worse.  L.R. was hospitalized two weeks after his second dose of hepatitis B injection in hospital Kasindo.  When this hospital had no success in improving L.R.’s health, L.R. has been transfered to the Childrens’ hospital in Koševo, and later, to Childrens’ hospital in Banja Luka, where he developed severe respiratory problems and subsequently died.

2) reported to VAERS, on June 29th 2011
vaccinated on: November 30th  2007, adverse reaction 6 days later, medical summary: hypotonia, heavy neural lesion, post vaccination encephalopathy, 100 % disability, psycho motor retardation, lack of sphincters control, not self feeding, underdeveloped speech,
A.M. was born as healthy baby, on November 29th 2007. Currently, A.M. has been officially recognized as being 100% disabled with psycho motor retardation.  He needs constant care and the assistance of another person.
A.M. received his at-birth Euvax B hepatitis B vaccine  on November 30th  2007. His following, 1-month, second Hep B vaccination was given on December 31th 2007.
The initial adverse event occurred six days after his second Hepatitis B vaccination. A.M. had a cardiovascular insult (CVI) event that required hospitalization. His CVI was accompanied by multi organ failure, cardiac arrest and resuscitation including the need of respiratory support during his trip to the hospital using the transport’s assisted breathing apparatus.  He had a discrete oral cyanosis and an apparent bacterial infection. He was in serious condition with sepsis, (Staphylococus aureus), post DIC (disseminated intravascular congulopathy) , St post reanimationem.
A.M. also suffers the inflammation of the brain.  He had an elevated level of urinary pterins that is indicative of cellular immune-system activation (while the reference range is  170-370, A.M.’s lab result was 840).  While encephalopathy was not diagnosed until 2009, there is a suspicion that his  doctors overlooked it earlier to avoid having to report it as a post-vaccination encephalopathy.  A.M. also has convulsions, Pallet investigated IgM were negative.  The immune-system results from a  lumbar puncture indicated: hepatitis markers HBsAg negative, antiHBs and anti HBc positive, total anti-HAV IgM positive, and anti-HC was negative.
A.M.’s other health status indicators are: disseminated intravascular congulopathy, deep metabolic acidosis and hyperkaliemia, hypercalcemia, asothermia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated transaminases, hypoglycemia, abnormal coagulogram that leads  to renal failure, hypoperfusion and hypoxia. He doesn’t control his sphincters.
A.M. has muscle hypotonia, decreased muscle tone in general, his extremities are stiff and rigid. 
Other A.M.’s registered health changes are poor feeding and he doesn’t gain adequate weight (vaccination-related loss of appetite and failure to thrive). 

3.)reported to VAERS, on June 30th  2011
vaccinated on: November 23th  2001, adverse reaction 13 days later,
medical summary: hypotonia, brain atrophy, epilepsy, 100 % disability, psycho motor retardation, lack of sphincters control, not self feeding, underdeveloped speech,
D.G.  was born as a healthy baby, on  November 21st 2001.  Now, D.G. has been officially recognized as being 100% disabled with psycho motor retardation. He needs constant care and the assistance of another person.
D.G. received hepatitis B vaccine third day of his life, on November 23th 2001. His initial early childhood vaccinations were: BCG on December 13th 2001, Hep B on December 25th 2001, on September 17th 2002, DTPr polio on February 2nd 2002, on  June 18th 2002, on September 17th 2002,   revaccination DTPr polio on February 24th 2004 and revaccination Di Te (diphtheria and tetanus, without pertussis) on March 19th  2006.
His adverse post-vaccination reaction appeared 13 days after his first DTPr vaccination, in third month of his life.  After this vaccination, D.G. began to make strange, rapid movements of his arms and legs. Ten days later, these movements become much stronger and after a couple of days they were repeated.  After that, arm and legs movements seemed like trembling.  This process of body reaction ended with his first epileptic convulsions on March 19th 2002.  In the initial event, which occurred about an hour before he was admitted to the hospital, he suddenly had a frozen leftward stare and oral cyanosis, without twitching of his limbs or his foaming at the mouth.  This initial “absence sezure” lasted for about 10 minutes.  His subsequent Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)/Magnertic Resonance Imiging (MRI) encephalogram showed signs of brain atrophy.  D.G. has been officially recognized as having a 100% disability and severe psychomotor retardation He needs constant care and the fulltime assistance of another person.
In early November 2002, D.G. suffered a striking deterioration, not talking and shaking, he was unconscious, and his eyes were ‘stiff’. Despite a changing of therapy he gets each month, in 2003, following a period without an attack, he once again began  having seizures, although less frequently than before, his lips becomes blue, he lost his consciousness and a twitching of extremities on both sides, and seizures. Although his epilepsy is rather resistant to drugs, it is now in good remission.  However,  he has no hygiene, no control of sphincters, and significant hypotonia.
According to prof. dr. Dusan Vranješević, there was a very minor asymmetry of D.G.’s heart’s chambers with the right chamber’s being the larger.  Interestingly, D.G.’s initial attack began as a partial seizure on the child’s left side.  In an attempt to clarify the etiology of D.G.’s condition, this professor discovered that important data was missing in D.G.’s discharge letter and that his mother was not capable to obtain crucial medical reports because “they had been lost in the hospital”.  There is only a descriptive entry by a Radiologist.  This narrative reports says that, while D.G. was in the hospital in Banja Luka in December 2002, there was a significant deterioration of his general health condition, with a very persistent high temperature.  The boy’s heart stopped beating and he received shocks and was resuscitated a couple of times, which could indicate that this child suffered periods of prolonged asphyxia and loss of blood flow to his brain, which could possibly be a major contributory factor to the child’s current clinical picture.
Urinary pterins laboratory report shows elevated values.  While the reference range is 130-320, D.G.’s results were 660 a value more than twice the upper end of the reference range  clearly inflammation of the brain. The urinary porphyrins reference range for CP/UP is 5-9; D.G. results  were 12.9,  more than 40 % above the upper limit on the reference range.  This value is indicative of a significant body burden of heavy metal, probably mercury, at levels that are toxic to the brain.
In discharge letter of hospital Banja Luka, issued on  April 12th 2001, dr. A. Sedlar findings show positive for IgM and IMG and the anti-CMV, hyperkinetic syndrome, RPH, CAT normal, more times a lumbar puncture, TORCH normal, and MRI normal.  D.G.’s EEG shows discrete focal irritative activity of Fp-Ft right EEG ,and also has incomplete paroxysms.
EEG shows more voltaic slow and steep waves of the last regions of both hemisphere, or medium voltaic slow waves posterior region of the right hemisphere.

4.) reported to VAERS, on July 1st 2011
vaccinated on: November 23th  2001, adverse reaction 13 days later,
medical summary: hypotonia, intramedullary lesion of TH7-8 segment, brain atrophy , vascular lesions Th 8 corps ,
post-punctional flaccid paraplegia, 100 % disability, psycho motor retardation, lack of sphincters control,
M.I. was born on March 9th 2003 with  polycythaemia neonati (neonatal very high hematocrit in her blood), hiperbilirrubinemia neonati simplex (excessively high level of bilirubin in blood), conjunctivitis (swollen eyelids), cyanosis (the appearance of a blue or purple coloration of the skin or mucous membranes due to the tissues near the skin surface being low on oxygen) and brachy    cardiac (low heart beat rate, typically <80 per minute ) , after that she was discharged as recovered and healthy. Now, M.I. has been officially recognized as having a 100% disability and severe psychomotor retardation. She needs constant care, the fulltime assistance of another person, and orthopedic accessories.  M.I. has hypotonia, sphincters is not controlled.
M.I.’s reported initial vaccination history is as follows: BCG on March 27th 2003, Hep B 1 on March 27th 2003, Hep B 2 on April 29th 2003, DTPr polio on May 13th 2003, on July 1st 2003, on September 5th 2003, Hep B 3 on November 4th 2003, rev. Hep B on March 30th 2004, rev. DTPr polio on September 14th 2004, rev. D TE on April 3rd 2009,
For 9 months, M.I. was completely healthy and apparently developing normally.The adverse reaction occurred one day after she was vaccinated with her third Hep B dose.  M.I. got vertigo and she became not stable on her feet, she had impression that something turns her head on right side, sometimes it is left side, and she looses her balance, with nausea, and the need to vomit, which on several occasions took place, and when it happens she always through out some white foamy liquid from her mouth in small quantity, and had sporadic muscle weakness.  In the moments of such crisis, she has abnormal eye movements, which only last for a short time. Beside that, M.I. appeared to be “tired” and had an increased desire for sleep.  She appeared to feel fatigue and to need to sleep as after a very exhausting day even though she had not been active.  This crisis was often repeated and doctors could not explain what is really happening. 
M.I.’s hyper CP chemistry has unexplained origin, CPK is very low, considerably more than expected for most mitochondrial diseases, the disease does not match any possibility that she suffers from some form of periodic paralysis, no data is received about any medication that may lead to iatrogenic myopathy with consecutive hyper CP chemistry that not determined a cause temporary muscle weakness.  It is not known with certainty what is her basic disease.  Definitive diagnosis is not established and the cause was not determined, all diagnostic possibilities in our country are exhausted.  

5.)reported to VAERS, on July 2nd 2011
vaccinated on: March 28th  2001, adverse reaction 5 days later,
medical summary: hypotonia, myoclonic epilepsy, brain atrophy , 100 % disability, psycho motor retardation, lack of sphincters control,
A.S. was born as healthy baby on March 28th 2005. Now, A.S. has been officially recognized as having a 100% disability and severe psychomotor retardation. She needs constant care, the fulltime assistance of another person. A.S. is hypotonic, sleepy,  has progressive myoklonic epilepsy, A.S. does not have control of her  sphincters, she is not able to feed her self.
A.S’s reported initial vaccination history is as follows: BCG on March 28th 2005, Hep B 1 on March 28th 2005, Hep B 2 on May 4th 2005, Hep B 3 on September 29th 2009, DTPr IPV on July 4th 2005, on August 17th 2005, on September 29th 2005, HIB on July 4th 2005, on November 3rd 2005.
Regarding the initial adverse event, there is a controversy concerning the time of occurrence and registration of the initial event.  When A.S. was at the age of ten months, her mother admitted to herself that her daughter, A.S., does not sit and do not use her right hand and arm.  Mother is convinced that it was obvious also before, when A.S. entered  the seventh month of her life, but the mother refused to believe, and closed her eyes to not see, what is happening with her daughter. When the child’s mother’s mental block was removed, A.S.’s mother remembered that A.S.’s adverse reaction had started 2 to 5 days after M.I.’s third Hep B vaccination on September 29th 2005.
Beside that, A.S. has disrupted rhythm of sleep and period of wakefulness .Sometimes she doesn't sleep for  48 hours  and then sleep for 20 hours and barely wakes up to food, so,  there are different phases biorhythm. A.S. is  occasionally very nervous, followed by hyperactivity she is  crying a lot, she does not eat and does not sleep for a couple of days and then comes a period of a couple of days  in which she again eats and sleeps.  A.S. does not have control of her sphincters.
There is no single word with a proper meaning, she has slowed speech development.  It seems that A.S. better understanding than possibilities of expression, the developmental tests results are below average results, the capacity of understanding of slow in terms of age.  A.S. seeks to eat and drink, she localize sounds.
The etiology of her difficulties has not been clarified.

6.) reported to VAERS, on July 13th  2011

 vaccinated on: October  4th  2007, adverse reaction 5 days later,
medical  summary: hypotonia, myoclonic epilepsy, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, brain atrophy , 100 % disability, psycho motor retardation, lack of sphincters control,
K.V. was born on October 3rd 2007 as a healthy baby.
Now, KV. has been officially recognized as having a 100% disability and severe psycho motor retardation. She needs constant care and the fulltime assistance of another person.  She has hypotonia  (low muscle tone), hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, severe atrophy of brain parenchyma, myoclonic epilepsy, drowsiness, and lack of feeling in her arms and legs,
She received Hep B vaccine a second day of her life, on October 4th 2007. Following immunizations are:  BCG October 4th 2007, HeB December 5 th 2007, DTPr  polio December  5th 2007.
Initial Event: hospital admissions: a week ago the mother, and seven days after receiving the second Hep B vaccine, mother noticed strange movements that appeared as a cerebral attack, several during the day. K.V. was twitching right hand with a clenched fist and the right foot.  The attacks always lasted longer and longer during next couple of days days, she was spreading both arms with a stiff glance and mother could not call her “to come back”.
The visible manifestations: Epi, DG: partial epilepsy with secondary generalization, she always has attacks in the form of myoclonism, Sy west in obs.  During the attacks she has short twitch of the lips and the deviation of eyeballs.  In the hospital she had 1-2 attacks a day. MR report shows hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy., and there is severe atrophy of brain parenchyma with a reduction in the volume of white matter in proportion to the enlargement of ventricles.  K.V. is unable to control her sphincters. Indicator of the inflammation of the brain is urinary pterins laboratory report. While reference range is 170-370, K.V.’s level was 1100, about 3 times the upper limit for the normal range.
Other relevant problems: excess glucocorticoids, hypocalcemia, hipofosfatermija, low levels of fibrinogen.  Bacterial pathogens: staphylococus aureus in nasal swabs.  Though there were amino  acids in CSF and an elevated level of glutamine, her spinal fluid was microbiologically sterile. 
Motor: less spontaneous movements, in the experiment of sitting her head remains back comparing to back, catching reflex present on the feet and hands, she does not hold head and doesn't change body position.  In the traction position, her head remains back relative to her body. She briefly follows objects with her eyes, but not when they are placed in her hand.

7.) reported to VAERS on July 4th 2011

vaccinated on: March  22th  2003, adverse reaction 7 days later,
medical summary: hypotonia,solitary cyst, autism, 100 % disability, psycho motor retardation, lack of sphincters control, underdeveloped speech,
Đ.K. was born on March 21th 2003, as a healthy baby.  Now, Đ.K. has been officially recognized as 100% disabled with severe psychomotor retardation. He needs constant care and the assistance of another person.  Đ.K. does not appear to be able  to perform independently any cognitive function and requires constant monitoring and care of another person.  His condition appears to be  irreversible.
He received Hep B vaccine a second day of his life, on March 22th 2003. Following immunizations are BCG May 13th 2003, Hep B May 13th 2003, October 13th 2003, DTPR polio  October 2nd 2003, October 13 th 2003, MRP April 6th 2005,
Đ.K. had severe hypotonia of his extremities and of the body, and spasticity of limbs. Ultrasound of central nervous system showed in atrial part a solitary cyst in the horizontal plexum, diameter 6 mm. When he was three-years old, he was operated on for Willis tumor and kidney. He also has ganglioneuroblastomatis and pyelonephritis,. Sphincters are not controlled. His speech is undeveloped without the words that has their function, occasionally use a voice singing vowels, he is not talking, Only the word “ give me” is intelligible when he asks to drink a water .
His first adverse reactions appeared seven days after he received his second Hep B vaccine dose and a BCG vaccine dose on May 13th 2003.  , In third month of his life, Đ.K. began to show first signs of the syndrome of insufficient development, considerably reducing his meals. One month later, in fourth month of his life, he began to laugh and responds to every request with increased screaming, showing elements of autism.  Another month later, in fifth month of his life, Đ.K. got bronchiolitis acute tachycardia, tachipneic aspect of patients in severe health conditions, and being very anxious.  But, even in such conditions, Đ.K. gained 700 grams of weight in a week. Then, his appetite began to decrease, and, at the end of this period, he completely refused food and water.
Bacterial findings showed  Escerihia coli, Candida, throat infection and virology finding showed negative meningeal signs.

8.) reported to VAERS, on July 4th 2011

vaccinated on: September  10th  2006, adverse reaction  6 days later,
medical summary: hypotonia, hypertrophy of brain cortex, autism, epilepsy, 100 % disability, psycho motor retardation, lack of walking, lack of sphincters control, underdeveloped speech,
D.S. was born as a healthy baby on September 9th, 2006. Now, D.S. has been officially recognized as being 100% disabled with severe psychomotor retardation. She needs constant care and assistance of another person.
D.S. received a dose of Hep B vaccine the second day of her life.  Following vaccines are: BCG on September  10th 2006; Hep B on September 10th 2006, October 13th 2006, and April 5th  2007; DTPr on November 15th 2006, January 12th 2007, and April 5th 2007; MRP on December 17th 2007; HIB on November 15th 2006 and January 10th 2007; and Hep B revaccination on January 03rd 2007, March 14th 2007 and April 8th 2008.
D.S. has hypotonia and her MRI shows hypertrophy of the brain cortex. D.S. has elements of autism.  Her EEG shows epileptic irritative elements.  D.S. does not control the sphincters and doesn’t feed herself.  D.S. has underdeveloped speech and she uses only syllables like ma-ma, and ba-ba.
Her first adverse reactions appeared six days after her second Hep B vaccination.  Her mother noticed that D.S. no longer followed the subjects with her glance, and that she has very rare and very slow movements with her legs.  At the age of nine months, at the occasion of a third Hep B and DTPr vaccination, pediatrician noticed that D.S. does not walk. She also seemed to be in his own world and she was never interested to watch her father and mother in their eyes.
D.S. has slow and disharmonius development. D.S. began to smile and to “talk” in the way that every so small child does when she had two months.  She was capable to sit by herself at 8 months, but she could not put herself autonomously in a position of sitting she can only maintain her sitting posture if someone else supports her.  At the age of 10 months if someone is helping her she can sit, but she could not take a vertical position by her own self, but she does grab objects with her hands.  
After a year, D.S. began to have a period of severe restlessness. She began to arch her body, hit her head and occasionally becoming limp. She no longer sleeps soundly, is continually rocking, and can no longer catch anything with her hands.  During the night, she has periods of slow intermittent breathing and grinds her teeth. D.S. also had the stereotypical hand movements as if she is making a bread with her hands, with abundant inappropriate stereotyped motor movements, movements of mouth, drooling, gnashing of teeth, a strong respiration that goes out of her mouth.  
At 18 months of age, she could walk only with assistance, and could she rotates from back to tummy and viceversa 21 months she could no longer crawl and cannot  independently position herself in a quadruped position.  She also expressed painovalgus, and she has variations in her motor reactions to sound .

In 2002, our organization  made a public call for Bosnian parents to refuse to immunize their children with Euvax B because we considered  that there is a lack of safety as well as that this project is classic pharmacological experiment. We were accused by public health authorities to “ be socially dangerous persons”, “who exaggerate safety problems “ and “destroy children’s health with premeditation”.

Author: Jagoda Savić
Reviewed by: Dr. Paul G. King, PhD

 

                        5

 

III)ELEVATED LEVELS OF MERCURY IN DTPr polio VACCINES

In July 2002, Federal ministry for public health imported cellular DTPr vaccine containing purified diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and an inactivated whole-cell pertussis component for the immunization of children. UNICEF “donated” this vaccine. On August 15th, 2002, one boy  received his third vaccination from a vial in this lot and lapsed into neurological status of comma and had clinical inflammation of his brain.

Following our request, the Federal government sent this boy to Boston, Massachusetts, USA and paid all his hospital costs.  This boy (M. T.) was permanently brain damaged to the point that he can no longer walk, is confined to a wheelchair, and has also been given a diagnosis of global developmental delay.

A prosecutor gave a prosecutorial order to impound his vial from Facility Dom zdravlja “Omer Maslić” and had it put in the freezer of Cantonal Ministry for Interiors, Forensic Department.  For nine years, neither this vial or a sample aliquot from it were sent a vial to laboratory in order for the contents of the vial to be subjected to a toxicology analysis designed to verify that the vials’s  content were within their specification.
Six years after that event, in 2008, we received laboratory reports from New York, about Bosnian twins sisters who were also transferred to USA after severe neurological deterioration, possibly connected with their vaccinations.  These sisters were vaccinated in Banja Luka and, shortly thereafter, developed a severe form of epilepsy.  The twins were tested by laboratory analysis for their mercury body burden (the presence of mercury in their bodies) using the established mercury-toxicity indicator test based on the assessment of the levels of their urinary porphyrins. This method can reveal the degree of intoxication of the subject’s body by mercury and a few other heavy metals. This test was conducted by an ISO-certified clinical laboratory, has been made in laboratory “Laboratoire Philippe Auguste” in Paris, France.  The results reported from this test “showed remarkable toxic effect of mercury on child's bodily physiology” for each child tested.

These findings motivated other parents to test for the presence of mercury toxicity in their child's body.  The parents of M. T. had the same analysis done and received results that indicated their child was also severely mercury poisoned.  For example, M. T.’s coproporphyrins/uroporphyrin (CP/UP) ratio was 21.4 where the lab’s reference range for “unaffected” children is 5 – 9.  Thus, M. T.’s result is more than twice the upper limit.    Unfortunately, the parents of some of the other similarly affected children were too poor to pay this analysis and it wasn't done.  But, based on the findings received from the children who were evaluated, the children seem to fall into one of three types of medical problems:
a.   Some children have indicators of an elevated, clinical level of mercury toxicity/poisoning in their body (body burden of mercury),
b.   Some children have indicators of severe brain inflammation, and
c.   Some children have indicators of viruses in their brain/spinal fluid where it shouldn't be instead of building up immunity against the infectious diseases for which they were vaccinated..

The investigation never qualified this event as heavy criminal act against a child’s health, according to article 240 from Federal Penal code. Beside that, the possibility of negligent actions upon the part of the local medical staff performing the vaccinations, which could also cause health damage to children according to article 229 of Federal Penal Code.

This investigation never verified:
a.   The total number of children with severe adverse events from a review of the Register of medical interventions within Neuropediatric Department and the Intensive Care Department of Children’s Hospital of Koševo,
b.   The  type of severe adverse events that were occurring and the frequency for each type, and
c.   The specific toxic factors that were triggering or contributing to the triggering of each of the adverse events observed,
Moreover, the investigators permitted these adverse events to repeat year after year  without any adequate action by the public health authorities to protect children's health.

The investigation started with the approach that the donor of the vaccine doses, which is organization that helps to children, could not have any premeditated intent to inflict severe health damage on  children.

Moreover, because of a lack of premeditation, there can't be criminal act.  The Prosecutor didn't want to recognize possible negligence, which is also persecuted by Bosnian Penal Code, or that a donor can be coerced by higher and more powerful institutions to provide financial profit at any cost, even with destroying children's health, or have an evil agenda to use vaccines to reduce the world’s population.
Other investigatory problems include, but are not limited to:
a.)The investigation never verified which statements in the instruction for use of this vaccine had been translated into the local language, what information was distributed to all of the local pediatric services, and what evidence there was, if any, that the translations of the appropriate vaccine information into the local language had been delivered to the local pediatric services. 
According to Bosnian Remedy Law, the instruction for use of vaccines should be translated into the local language and provided to the local vaccine providers before the start of the public use of a vaccine. The declaration of the nurse who assisted to the vaccination of M. T. about a lack of that translation, which was given to the police, clearly indicated that this matter needed to be investigated.
b.)The investigation did not consider the possible harmful outcomes when the person giving the vaccine cannot read and understand the instructions because they have not been translated into their language.   In this instance, the usage instructions for the DTPr vaccine from the Australian manufacturer CSL Limited were written in three languages – none of which were the recognized local languages of Bosnia and Herzegovina.  The instructions require the vaccine vial to be shaken vigorously before each use so that the adjuvant onto which the vaccine components are absorbed will be uniformly suspended in the liquid to form a suspension of the absorbed antigenic elements in the vaccine and the Thimerosal that might be absorbed into the adjuvant’s matrix and/or associated with the sulfur groups in the absorbed DTPr antigens.  That the vial used in the reported cases was well shaken just prior to the withdrawal of the dose given was not verified.  If the vial is not shaken according to the directions, then the concentration of the adjuvant containing the absorbed antigens and possibly some bound thiomersal/thimerosal from its use as a preservative will not be uniformly distributed in the vial.  In such instances it is possible for the child being vaccinated to get a higher than approved dose of the adjuvant with its absorbed antigens and possible excess of thiomersal/thimerosal, which may have caused or worsened the adverse reactions that the inoculees receiving such doses may have experienced.  The usage instructions also state that, after opening a vial and properly dispensing the labeled number of doses from it, the remaining liquid and solids should be properly disposed of.  However, though the vial in question was refrigerated (frozen) overnight, the investigation did not have the remainder of if the contents of that vial analyzed to establish whether or not the levels of the adjuvant, antigens, and Thimerosal were within their allowed limits.
c.)The problem with the failure to shake is that the suspension will not be uniform , which will result in some children’s getting a lower dose of the vaccine’s active ingredient antigens and others getting a higher than recommended dose.  Since Thimerosal is highly soluble in water, would not expect there to be much of a Thimerosal-dose-size issue or a significant Thimerosal gradient in the vial.  Factually, some of the toxins in the pertussis component (Pr) of the DTPr vaccine are much more toxic on a molar basis to the central nervous system, especially the brain stem, than Thimerosal is.Given the components involved, it is not likely that refrigeration or freezing would have caused any chemical reactions.
d.)The investigation did not verify that, before the vaccine vials in the shipment to the Institute for Public Health were used, the vaccine vials had been properly transported and stored.   For example, the investigation did not verify that the refrigerator in which the DTPr vaccine vials were stored was really functioning properly and maintaining the temperature of the contents of the vaccine vials as the instructions for such vaccines generally direct: “Store at 2° to 8°C (35° to 46°F).  Do not freeze.” Or, if improper storage could have increased the toxicity of the vials’ contents.
e.)There was no investigation to ensure that the vaccine was purchased in proper manner.  For example, it is unknown whether CSL Limited was on WHO's list of prequalified suppliers of vaccines in 2002 or if the purchase of this consignment of vaccines was made according to the rules for such vaccine purchases.  Legally, a vaccine purchase can only be executed if that vaccine was on the WHO’s prequalified list before the purchase us initiated.
Beside that, the WHO, that gave its opinion that this DTPr vaccine was acceptable for humanitarian activities including UN missions, proposed this very cheap vaccine with unknown level of adverse neurological risk.  We know this because, in the declaration of the manufacturer, the vaccine’s manufacturer wrote that there was a risk of adverse neurological consequences on children’s health, but that it had not assessed the incidence level of the various risks.
Local public health authorities were claimed to be protected from legal claims by an umbrella indemnification claimed in an advisory opinion issued by WHO’s department for vaccine safety, GACVS, in response to a question in this regard from Bosnia and Herzegovina.  GACVS answered that vaccines with preservative thiomersal are not risky.  However, the local medical staff didn't ask GACVS under what conditions thiomersal can be toxic to susceptible babies.  Moreover, GACVS' answer is not acceptable because of being too generic and  not precise.
Mercury in this DTPr vaccine is contained in the thiomersal, which was nominally added to preserve the contents of the vial from microbial contamination that may occur when sterile technique is not maintained in the withdrawal of doses of the vaccine doses from a vaccine vial. Thiomersal is sodium ethylmercury thiosalicylate, which is claimed to be not dangerous to the children’s health because the quantity in a dose of vaccine is not dangerous and because the quantity injected is claimed to be rapidly excreted from the children’s body.  However, a 1968 study done in Japan using radiolabeled ethylmercury compounds failed to show that more than 15% of the dose of the ethylmercury compounds studies was rapidly excreted ; and an analysis of the only long-term chronic toxicity study in rats that used thiomersal (thimerosal) found that the amount of mercury from injected thiomersal/thimerosal in a U.S. Thimerosal-preserved DTaP vaccine was 0.0042 micrograms of mercury per kilogram of infant body weight per day – a level 23.8 times lower that the U.S. Environmental Agency’s (EPA’s) 0.1 microgram of per kilogram of body weight per day for iingested (eaten) methylmercury spieces from fish consumption. 
g.)Prof. Dragan Joksovic has stated that some unknown factor could block the excretion of mercury from child's body in the predicted period and transform it into a methyl mercury compound, which is also a neurotoxin First, the predicted period of time is such that the general half-life for excretion of mercury bound up in the brain is on the order of 18-20 years.  Second, to excrete mercury with any efficiency, the child must be producing liver bile – something that very young children do not produce much of.  Third, there are genetic mutations in the genes that produce the enzymes that control the methylation of folates and other biochemicals that can reduce the production of INTRACELLULAR reduced glutathione, the body’s principal mercury detoxification compound and elevated androgen levels, that can be caused by mercury poisoning also decrease glutathione production.  Fourth, it is known that many antibiotics block the excretion of mercury.  While there may be some other “unknown” factors that reduce mercury excretion, the principal ones are known and probably account for more than 90% of the variability of excretion. Factually, ethyl mercury compounds appear to be more toxic to human brain cells than methyl mercury compounds!
Some other experts state that the real cause could be the inflammation of the brain that caused a lack of brain command to excrete mercury from the body. They also stated that the inflammation of the brain is known to be caused by the toxins in the pertussis component of vaccine, one of three disease-related antigenic components that are a part of the DTPr vaccine.
The pertussis component does not provide protection from the B. pertussis bacteria but what it is supposed to do is cause the body to produce antibodies to the pertussis toxins and, thereby, protect the vaccinated person from developing the toxic reactions to the pertussis toxins that are linked to the brain injury and death associated with invasive pertussis infections in young children..
Thus, it is also important to know the child’s level of mercury body burden (which can be estimated by a valid urine prophyrin profile analysis) as well as to know about conditions which may have contributed to development of the observed toxicity. These comments are not supported by the facts.  Factually, in a vaccine solution, Thimerosal/Thiomersal slowly reacts to form ethylmercury chloride, ethylmercury hydroxide and sodium thiosalicylate and becomes bound to the sulfur-based amino acids in the proteins in the vaccine formulation.  In general, provided the vaccine vials are not heated to a temperature that denatures the antigens (generally, > 10-30°C depending upon the time of exposure). 
If ethyl mercury compounds, known human neurotoxins, are transformed into the corresponding or related methyl mercury compounds which are also neurotoxins and the vaccine contains pertussis toxins that are known to attack the central nervous system, ,all of these may, to varying degrees, attack a child's brain and damage or destroy some centers for vital brain functions, such as the centers for breathing control, speech, movement, and upper intellectual functions, to name a few.
Thus, the declarations of minister of health of Republic of Srpska, Ranko Škrbić, Professor of Pharmacology, provoked much concern.  This professor-minister stated publicly that vaccines without thiomersal do not exist.  However, Glaxo said that, for more than 5 years, it has used 2-phenoxy-ethanol for a preservative instead of thiomersal in its DTPr vaccine.
Should the retained vials of vaccine be sent out to a laboratory for analysis?

A prosecutor asked the Federal Institute for Public Health if a vial should be sent to some certified laboratory for full testing. According to the Law for a protection of citizens against infective diseases, this institute is responsible for dealing with the activities in vaccination and should be a first institution to be suspect when there is something wrong with a vaccine. Thus, by consulting this institute, the prosecutor, in fact, put a suspected institution in a legal position to making decisions about what could have been its own mistake, which is a legal absurdity.  Moreover, Article 112 of the Penal Procedure Code regulates who can be used as an expert and it excludes persons from the suspected institution
The Federal Institute for Public Health answered, “that crucial elements of the liquid of the vial has expired and actual analysis, after a couple of years wouldn't give acceptable results”.
There are four opposite opinions to this public health authority’s statement.
First of all, the Forensic Department of the Cantonal Ministry for Internal Affairs stated that the suspect, sequestered vial has been properly stored  inside a freezer, in closed box bound with a tamper-evident ribbon that would show any unauthorised opening and the contents of this vial could be used in testing to clarify vaccine-conformity-to-claim-related issues.  Besides that, there are another four, never-opened vials, and their laboratory analysis could be also useful for clarification of the facts.
Second, one of the most famous laboratories in the world, the Austrian “Life Sciences”  laboratory that has EN /ISO /IEC 17025 certification unofficially stated in a letter dated April 22nd, 2009, “mercury always remain mercury, and the age of the substance tested doesn't influence the analysis.”
Third, Prof.Dr. Dragan Joksović, a clinical toxicologist and juridical expert for toxicology, ex-head of the Center for Poisoning within the MEDICAL Military Academy in Belgrade, sent a letter in  February 2008 that gave his unofficial opinion about the case and asked for the authorities to send him a sample from M. T.'s vial so that he could look at it in the laboratory and expose it to a chemical-toxicology analysis in order to verify the cause of heavy metal (mercury) poisoning, that his urine porphyrin result indicates.  In that letter, Prof. Joksović knew that he was talking about a liquid that was more than seven-years old.
Fourth, in his medical report on July 1st, 2009, Prof. Dr. Osman Sinanović, a neurologist and a recognized judicial expert in neurology, stated that there was a “strong link between the manifestation of disease and DTPr immunization”.
In his media declarations, Prosecutor Kreštalica made misleading statements. This prosecutor declared that “in laboratory analysis, it is not written that mercury poisoning is caused by vaccine, and, because of this, it is not necessary to send a vial to a laboratory”.  Only persons who well know penal procedure can recognize this misleading explanation.  Prosecutor Kreštalica confused two types of laboratories that should be involved in this investigation, laboratories that have two completely different assignments:
a.   One is a laboratory that should be able to give a statement about the components in the contents of the vaccine vial.  Juridical expert toxicologist would examine laboratory result and give his opinion about possible influence of the liquid on health damage of the child, and evaluate if there is possible cause-consequence relation between a vaccine and health deterioration, and
b.   The other is a  laboratory that should be able to give a statement about a quantity of, or level of, toxic substances in child's body and/or about the dynamics of toxic affect observed for the child, that should be basis for verification of the severity of the health damage to the child.

In keeping with his conviction that pharmacological characteristics of vaccine cannot have toxic effects, Prosecutor Kreštalica missed other investigative steps. This approach, “pharmacology without toxicology”, amounts to blind belief in the unsubstantiated declarations of the public health professionals, who are conflicted by having their compensation tied to vaccination programs.

Problems with the vaccine lot’s Certificate of Attestation

In support of the safety of the vaccine, the prosecutor verified an absolutely unreadable certificate of attestation. This certificate is unacceptable because its dimensions were resized to be so small that it is impossible to read it.  So, the content of certificate is completely unknown.  However, this unreadable document was sufficient to cover Prosecutor Kreštalica’s decision to not investigate the liquid of the vaccine.
At the end of 2008, one journalist from “Press” from Banja Luka found an original certificate of attestation for the DTPr vaccine within the former Institute for Pharmacy of Serbia, now, the Agency for Remedies and Medical tools, ALIMS.  According to unofficial information from that institution, the certificate issued at the same time is not a guarantee of the declarations written in certificate of attestation.  The reason is very simple, the institute was in serious financial difficulties and did not have enough sample analysts (or chemical analysts) to conduct the necessary analyses.  So, it seems that institute issued certificates that were not based on an actual analysis.
During one meeting with Prosecutor Kreštalica, when he was asked to take investigative action and ask for official control of the “Register of Executed Analyses” in the former institute, the prosecutor refused to do that.
When original document has been sent to a prosecutor, it was visible that certificate of attestation has the date of August 12th, 2002 and that our vaccination program wasn't covered by this certificate.  This is the case because the vaccinations started much earlier than the date on which that certificate arrived, which is a violation of the law.  Moreover, the attestation was made only for the Bosnian Republic of Srpska and not for the entire Federation of BiH, where the vaccination program occurred.  Beside that, the certificate found has two protocol numbers: 4331/ 2002 and 4769/ 2002, on the same document, which is unacceptable for such documents.
Beside that, a laboratory report, nr 02/ 183, was found that was issued by the manufacturer's quality control/assurance laboratory before the entrance of vaccine abroad.  This certificate found that said that vaccine was correct at the time of its release.
The prosecutor also never provided evidence that the 25, 000 Euros, given by Federal government in October 2002 for a purchase of the required doses of the DTPr vaccine had been used to purchase them.  While the UNICEF's contingent of whole-cell DTPr vaccines had been retired from public use and the money was really used to buy 10,000 new doses of acellular DTPr vaccines.  In judicial file KTA 384/ 02, there are no invoices from any vaccine manufacturer who produces acellular DPTr vaccines. There is no evidence also about the destruction of the retired contingent.  There is  no evidence if the “destroyed” vaccines have been delivered to a donor.  There is a doubt that the retired contingent was retired only for a short period of time, and that it was put in use again, when the media writings about it stopped. 
Prosecutor Kreštalica had legal basis to send one of the impounded vials with batch number BO 0434-03202 to a laboratory for testing.  In the discharge letter of M. T. from Children’s hospital Koševo, issued on October 2nd, 2002, on page 3, in the last sentence, it was written: “it is not excluded hypoxic changes produced by toxic effect”.
Beside that, the finding of Prof. Dr. Mark Libenson, Director of the Center for Epilepsy within Children’s Floating Hospital in Boston, sent to federal deputy minister for international cooperation, Goran Čerkez, on page 4 clearly states: “but the timing of his febrile illness and subsequent neurological deterioration just after his immunization causes us to favor Post-pertussis Encephalopathy as the most likely diagnosis at the current time”.
This finding shows some brain inflammation process in child's body, and it should be a basis to expose a vial, if the information about mercury was unknown, to bacteriological analysis, to verify the origin of brain inflammation.
Hospital Koševo sent M. T.'s sample to a laboratory. His laboratory report was generated by the Laboratory for Enteroviruses, in the Institute for Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, 61105 Ljubljana, 4, Zaloška Street, in testing conducted reported on September 9th, 2002.
The results of that analysis were:
IgG      spinal fluid negative       serum 14, 3VE      ref. values   9-11 VE
IgM     spinal fluid negative       serum negative     ref. values   9-11 VE
This laboratory report was signed by Director Tatjana Zupanc-Avšič and was transcribed by us during a permitted access to the judicial file KTA 384/ 02 in 2004 under our Law for free access to information.  In 2009, when we again asked and were granted free access to judicial file, this laboratory report had disappeared from the judicial file.  Moreover, when the loss of this record was reported, the prosecutor didn't even check to see if the Register of Executed Analyses in Ljubljana still contained M. T.’s analysis or not.
Moreover, Prosecutor Kreštalica asked medical opinion from Hospital Koševo about causes of M.T.’s disease. Four doctors with no appropriate professional profile gave their opinion.  Instead of seeking the opinion of the available hospital neurologist and its toxicologist, the prosecutor allowed the opinion to be given by:

These four doctors gave their medical opinion about causes of M. T.’s medical condition. They were also allowed to evaluate the finding about M. T.’s genetic defects that was made by Dr John Schoenhoffer from Atlanta, although no one of them was registered on the list of medical judicial experts in molecular biology and genetics nor did any have a permit from cantonal ministry of justice to act as experts in the field of molecular biology and genetics.
Beside that, the oxidative phosphorilation issue that M. T. was found to have has no known cause-consequence relation to his neurological deterioration.

On May 7th 2009 our organization asked help of High representative of UN and special representative of EU in BiH to protect the law and to use his authority to provide evidencies for   penal investigation KTA 384/ 02. Only thing asked was to send sequestered vial in laboratory to be exposed to chemical and toxicology analysis. At that time it was seven years that a vial stays in freeze of Ministry for internal affairs of Canton Sarajevo.
Valentin Intzko gave this request to his legal office and to his advisers for human rights, who refused our request.
On November 24th 2009 Kevin Curtis from UNICEF internal control unit evaluated  our efforts  as“ attack on UNICEF“ . Mr. Curtis talk aboutsafe vaccines and we talk about immature liver and wrong vaccination schedule. Beside that, mr.Curtis tressed „ joint concern about ill- informed attempts to discredit immunization in Bosnia and Herzegovina.“

On July 13th 2004 and September 15th 2004 John H. Mc Nair, a head of special department  for organized criminal within Prosecution BiH received arequest of our organization to investigate criminal act agaist public health. On September 27th Mr.Mc Nair answered on our request  in KTA 385/ 04 inf orming us to put this juridical file ad acta, because cantonal proseutor Sead Kreštalica answered that the investigation is going on according to his plann and that he has no iintentions to send this investigation to Prosecution  BiH.
On April 6th 2009 and on May 27th 2009 our organization asked Drew Engel, the head of special department  for organized criminal within Prosecution BiH received the request of our organization to investigate a crime against public health.

6
Shameful UNICEF’s Certificate of attestation, sized as not readable document

 

 

 

 

          7              

 

 

The confirmation of the police commissioner that the vials that had been impounded on October 10th, 2002 are  still in their freezer.

 

 

 

  Ideally, in addition to recording the lot number, used in the vaccine records, the vaccine records should contain the name of the manufacturer of the vaccine, the name of the vaccine, the vaccine’s expiration date, and, if preserved, the nature of the preservative used in the vaccine as well as the specific time of administration and the name of the person who gave the injection.  In addition, using indelible waterproof ink, for multiple-dose vials, the first person withdrawing a dose form a given vial should be required to record the date and time that vials started to be used.  For single-dose vials and syringes, the date and initials of the child to whom it was given should be recorded on the vials.  Finally, the facility in which the vial used was provided should be required by law to retain all used vials (and, if dispensed in a pre-filled syringe, the syringes used) for not less than 15 days after its last use.

    These include, but are not limited to, breathing rate, measuring the respiratory volume, gas exchange in the lungs, the use of auxiliary respiratory muscles, cellular respiration, the volume of each breath, inadequate ventilation and perfusion, the lack of oxygen in the blood volume of each breath, inadequate ventilation and perfusion, the lack of oxygen in the blood and carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaO2 and PaCO2), and cyanosis.

    Vaccines against diphtheria and tetanus and pertusis - ALDIPETE-T (Institute for virology, vaccines sand serums, “Torlak” Serbia).

  Pneumonia as disease is caused with  bacteries infections  such as Moraxella Catarrhalis, Streptoccocus pneumoniae,  Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae (J15.0), Escherichia coli (J15.5), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or "atypical" bacteria such as Coxiella burnetii, Chlamydophila pneumoniae (J16.0), Mycoplasma pneumoniae , Legionella pneumophila, Yersinia pestis etc., or with viral infections such as Influenza virus A and B, Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV),  Adenoviruses,Metapneumovirus, , Severe acute respiratory syndrome virus (SARS coronavirus) etc.

      Takeda Y, Kunugi T, Hinsino O, Ukita T. Distribution of Inorganic, Aryl, and Alkyl Mercury Compounds. Toxicol Applied Pharmacol 1968; 13: 156-164 – from the graphs provided.

      http://mercury-freedrugs.org/docs/090812_fnldrft_TheTruthAboutTheToxicityOfThimerosalr5b.pdf